mob : noisy croud of people, who have come together to shout ,fight, etc และนี่ให้ชัดเจนไปอีก mob: disorderly croud of people... a flock or herd of animals....บอกว่าความหมายดั้งเดิมจากลาตินว่า excitable croud คือเขามองว่าเหมือนกลุ่มสัตว์สี่เท้าที่แตกตื่นอะไร มา นั่นแหละ แล้วเสียงที่ออกมาก็เหมือนเสียงหมู่สัตว์เหล่านั้น(พอ ๆ กับฝ่ายค้านในสภาไทยยุคนี้เลย) แล้วจะไปเชื่อถือได้อย่างไร ?
Political parties that use mob as a tool is that mob Just like a group of four-footed animals that have only been stunned. What can you trust?
How can a political party that relies on the mob as a tool can be as trusted by the people as the mob itself? When that mob is The crowd cannot find a place to stand for their own reference. Unjustifiable And there is no democratic politics in any country to accept it, because the mob is meant only as a group of people who have voiced the noise of the villagers.
According to this definition, mob: noisy croud of people, who have come together to shout, fight, etc, and here it is more clear: mob: disorderly croud of people ... a flock or herd of animals .... Originally from Latin, excitable croud is that he sees it as a frightened quadruped, and the sound that comes out, is like the sound of those beasts (as well as the opposition in the Thai parliament today) to be trusted.
How? Surprisingly, the political parties in this country, the people of this country, and especially journalists in this country, went back to praising their parliamentary parties. Coming from the people of the whole country To praise the government Compared to the council of representatives of the whole country Even looking for an answer to each other, how will the two sides agree? ... Well, a mob is a mob as defined here. And how will it be equal to parliament How is it equal to the government? Indeed, the people should come out and get fired. As if chasing a mad dog from a village Hit the head of it to die. @ Su-ngai Padi Chinakun 20 Oct 2020 20.30