During the 1990s, the country began making more diplomatic overtures toward its neighbors. In 1995, the U.S. announced a lifting of its ban on aid to the nation. By most international estimates, Laos is one of the 10 poorest countries in the world. The subsistence farmers who make up more than 80% of the population have been plagued with bad agricultural conditions—alternately floods and drought—since 1993.
U.S. Department of State Background note Loas ว่าไว้อย่างนี้ครับ
Laos is a poor, landlocked country with an inadequate infrastructure and a largely unskilled work force. The country's per capita income in 2006 was estimated to be $572. Agriculture, mostly subsistence rice farming, dominates the economy, employing an estimated 78% of the population and producing 43.4% of GDP. Domestic savings are low, forcing Laos to rely heavily on foreign assistance and concessional loans as investment sources for economic development. In 2006, donor-funded programs accounted for 13% of GDP and 70% of the capital budget. In 2006, the country's foreign debt was estimated at $3.2 billion.
Pheu Thai Party proposes to amend the Constitution 60
-----
There are two main problems in world politics: 1. The civilized world needs democracy and respects democracy as a religion. And in this era, democracy has been spread to countries that are not yet democratic. He wants the world to be democratic for the whole world. This has a principle that people around the world like. Great satisfaction is the principle of free people. liberal democracy So it's a story that tells a human being. And there are human rights all over the world. As for the world political problem, the second problem is the dictatorship and dictatorship that is a stable system at the world power level. One side is communism. Originally led by China and Russia, but Russia has changed to Democracy is gone The rest is that China is the leader of the communist world, and Western political educators point out that communism is gradually disappearing until today, there are only seven communist countries left in the world. According to a farang named Matt Rosenberg, captioned by a Geography expert, there are only five communist countries left in the world right now: China, Cuba, Laos, North Korea and Vietnam.
We talk about communist dictatorship because there are some gaps that our Thai people may not understand. that communist When a communist dictator Political parties have full power. Not only above the people of their own country (people are slaves), but in the present global system. Any communist country that is a communist, the remaining 5 countries have their own boss as well, such as Cuba, Laos, North Korea, and Vietnam, this has Red China as the boss. It means that the policy of the communist country must always be consistent with the mother country, that is, China is always red. This is in line with the communist dictatorship (that is, more special than the already detestable dictatorship) like Laos. Here, you need to consult China, ask for permission from China, it's normal, for example, about Laos' high-speed trains. that connects Laos to China and has plans to connect to Thailand Allowing China to carry goods down easily for the benefit of China directly. The project in 2016 that was completed will be open for use in December. This is all planned by China, although Laos has no way of doing it on its own. Laos said that there was not a single baht. China is said to be able to do so by providing investments in loans. In which China will have to collect interest and get the capital back from Laos in a self-determined way. The Lao people do not know about it at all. I don't even know how many tens and hundreds of years will be taxed to pay for his debts. Well, Laos was already taken over by China because of the lack of money to pay off the Mekong River, and the United Nations upgraded Laos to a 4th-level world country, meaning it's not a Developing Country at level 3). this Therefore, it was given as a special level, which was level 4. And call them The Fourth World, the 4th world, according to the foreigner's information as follows, please read.
During the 1990s, the country began making more diplomatic overtures toward its neighbors. In 1995, the U.S. announced a lifting of its ban on aid to the nation. By most international estimates, Laos is one of the 10 poorest countries in the world. The subsistence farmers who make up more than 80% of the population have been plagued with bad agricultural conditions—alternately floods and drought—since 1993.
U.S. Department of State Background note Loas said this.
Laos is a poor, landlocked country with an inadequate infrastructure and a largely unskilled work force. The country's per capita income in 2006 was estimated to be $572. Agriculture, mostly subsistence rice farming, dominates the economy, employing an estimated 78% of the population and producing 43.4% of GDP. Domestic savings are low, forcing Laos to rely heavily on foreign assistance and concessional loans as investment sources for economic development. In 2006, donor-funded programs accounted for 13% of GDP and 70% of the capital budget. In 2006, the country's foreign debt was estimated at $3.2 billion.
[In 2006 (2006 B.E. The communist country of Laos has a foreign debt of $3.2 billion]....Does the Lao people know? That Lao people are the ones who have to pay their heads down to pay their debts to foreign countries... As for dictators, it's fine
Do the Lao people know about these things? No, because they are communist dictatorships. how?
We're just saying this in order to understand democratic politics and dictatorship. What is the difference between Communist dictatorship? Why people don't like dictatorships and Thai people, we don't like dictatorships and don't want to be a communist dictator at all. And the communist war has been successfully suppressed for many decades. It's a lot of damage like a politician's ruler. The political system holds complete power to find debts into the country for the Lao people to work until the end of their lives. we hate dictators
But why today and many years since a big politician, Thaksin Shinawatra, went out of power to roam the country and used his money to disrupt the political situation in Thailand, until now, there is a full Thai opposition party waiting to accept the policy? to harass the nation and think of bringing that money politician back to Thailand For example, Thaksin said recently that Thailand's economic situation is extremely poor today, if he comes back, he can only fix it in 6 months, which is probably just a joke. hard to believe Apart from the Pheu Thai Party and Mr. Thanathorn Juangroongruangkit and Mr. Sutin Klangsang, Mr. Cholanan Srikaew
And what the Pheu Thai Party did yesterday is submitted to amend the constitution which should be done according to the orders of the people That itself (he was the leader of the party before), but the people will see that It's a concept that's not entirely democratic. This has always been the case for the Pheu Thai Party. But why does he always propose something that is inconsistent with democracy in constitutional amendments?
Therefore, it is thought that as a Thai people who have freedom I would like to point out the point of ignorance of the opposition party despite claiming to fight for democracy all along. but did not follow the principles of democracy which people at this level and then do this People should take it further into consideration that it is not appropriate to be in the House of Representatives or the National Assembly, that is, do not choose the Pheu Thai Party to enter the House again. because ignorance does not know about democracy at all
That is, they do not understand political power at the parliamentary level. The simple thing that democrats should understand is a democratic principle is that parliament is required in a democratic system. And the National Assembly always has two houses for mutual examination, namely the upper house and the lower house (that is, what we call the House of Representatives. with the Senate itself), which here can be seen Parliament has members of the National Assembly (each member is a democratic principle). It is here that the legislative power of democracy must be understood. Everyone must be equal Whether it's a member of the House of Representatives or a senator (no matter where they come from, but coming into the position of a member of parliament must respect this reason, politics can progress) but the Pheu Thai Party is wrong again. like a person who has no ideas of his own Think of others in a way that is more cynical than self-deprecating. That is, to amend the constitution. Reduce the power of senators to be inferior to members of the House of Representatives For what reason? Why do you think about reducing the power of some members of Parliament to be inferior to another part? That is, it has proposed to amend Section 272 (which the opposition Future Forward Party has always proposed) to not give the Senate the power to elect the prime minister. only the members of the House of Representatives or the lower house of parliament have the powers. which is against the principle of democratic political power on the issue of legislative power and executive power, how? Can't do it!! But why does this party think like this? Which eventually collapsed and was dismissed because of the politicians themselves, who lack quality, unrighteousness and patience to do what is right. not respecting the correctness right principle So how to build a democratic nation?
This is what we have found. and see how it can do this It's at this level of a political party. Our country will have political parties that do not respect the principles. Don't know the way to success that must be done right in principle Why is it wrong and how will it prosper? Why don't you think? which is correct, must be viewed with political rationality will reduce the power of members of parliament How can you not be equal? How can it be called equality? How can a person like a boss on one side and a subordinate come together in parliament? Everyone must have the same power!! It seems that the Thai opposition party acts like a political party in Laos, so it's really like!! would have believed that the Thai economy would be solved by Mr Thaksin. Shinawatra just got him back. It took only 6 months without any people. Who would believe other than fools, stupid parties like the Pheu Thai Party and the Progress Party at this time? This speaks to the quality of people who are unfit to be placed in this prestigious parliament. Now, amend the constitution. As proposed by the Pheu Thai Party, let's wait and see if this stupid, selfish idea will pass or not. and there will be an amendment to the constitution60 How to come out to promote Thai democracy to be more advanced? That Thai people must follow and see .