Parliament meeting to consider and vote on the draft constitution, which 135,347 people signed for amendment. which had been through all day discussion yesterday. Today, vote on whether or not to accept the principles of this new constitution by means of an open vote. We might want to know who's in the House of Commons so we can listen to his name in the open vote. Who's who?
Started 1. Prime Minister Kanok Limtarakool ..... 8. Mr. Krung Sriwilai does not accept principles ....17 does not accept principles 19 Not accepting the principles 20 Not accepting principles 21Professor..doesn't vote 24Accepts principles 51 doesn't accept principles 52 Accepting principles........ 55 Mr. Khamnoon Sitthisamarn does not accept the principle...... 85 Mrs. Jiraporn Sinthuprai.... Silence.... Until 723 people attended the National Assembly. would be an hour
Alright, let's make some comments for the exchange of political views. There are things that we can conclude as follows: proponent of the draft The new constitution, consisting of Mr. Pharit Wattanasin and Mr. Piyabutr Saengkanokkul, gathered a list of 135,341 people in order to get the right to accept the matter to be submitted to the National Assembly for consideration. Which can be seen as a list of names and roles of the opposition movement in and outside the parliament itself means that the proposal of the opposition party in the parliament Since the Pheu Thai Party (with a new party leader, Chonnan Srikaew) and the Kao Klai Party of Pita Limcharoenrat, and both progressive groups that do opposition politics outside of Mr. Thanathorn's council Juangroongruangkit....who plays a strong role until the point that there is a lawsuit against the Constitutional Court. It's a big event. Big news, big news. It's coming soon. It is the matter that the Constitutional Court considers the role of the extra-conventional movement that thinks revolutionary overthrows the democratic regime with the King as head of state as a rebel. I saw a message that said Probably didn't pass from the beginning.
Because it is a constitution that comes from ignorance and not understanding the principles of democratic governance, maybe there are some famous Ilaws involved? or was hit by Mr. Piyabutr Lost again in the way of a madman, lost his mind, that's it, took only two
1. Propose a unicameral House of Representatives, abolish the Senate. This is to say that the proponents are our street children. how to get Regarding the democratic parliament, he has already reached a universal resolution. There's no point in wasting your time considering it again. because it has been in the system for hundreds of years The National Assembly is the lower house and the upper house. The parliament is the lower and high people's council, which together constitute a complete democracy. At the end, what should be understood and made better for Thailand is to determine the qualifications of the Senator to be senior and have a lot of experience. Specially, don't take the form of the House of Representatives, because Senator. We want to have knowledge to examine matters from the lower house of parliament (Sor.) It is a characteristic of the prudence of the National Assembly, and secondly, the source of the Senate should be given. By election, this will be a complete, truly democratic parliament.
2. Propose to members of the House of Representatives sent the House of Representatives to sit in the Judicial Court and to sit in the Defense Council That's really the idiot idea that you don't give the freedom of The three powers are equal and equal, that is, the judge is the judicial power. His defense is executive power. We have to understand how these three powers are related from the beginning. and had to check each other out from the beginning The performance of each power fully independent any power will not be able to intervene So that's democracy. Do you understand the reason? And here you go. MPs sent people to direct him. Well, you're acting like his boss. This is an idea for the legislature to be too big. until he became a dictator can't do that All three powers are equal. to maintain neutrality You can look at academic terms. Legislative power, executive power, judicial power are the supreme powers in a democracy. is these three powers There is equality. but there is a correlation How are the three powers under the power of the people? This is what makes it right. So there will be democracy and fairness.....and it already has its own system. Go get some understanding, there will be no such idiot offering. waste of time
Only these 2 items are not passed. I tell them and tell the people that Opposition to propose a new constitution They are all those who do not understand democracy. All of them have always acted as dictators in the National Assembly, claiming to be democratic. Please consider not to put this side into politics, they will cause damage like ignorance. especially those related to the institutional revolution. That he has publicly announced on the stage, August 10, 2020 at Thammasat University, Rangsit until the people who love good deeds have filed a lawsuit against the Constitutional Court until the Constitutional Court has decided since the beginning of last month. especially now There are also people who think revolutionary this institution is involved in elections. TAOs across the country, which will be held on November 28, 2021, we only exercise the rights of one person, one vote, equal political power of the people according to the rules of equality. Only decisively clean up the institution and that's it. Solve problems with the power of the people directly. as well as future major elections. It's the right way to use your power like this.
Arrived 416 Did not accept the principle ..... 418 419 420 Mr. Rangsiman Rome accepts the principle .......424 does not accept the principle ........429 Gen. Lertluck Rattanavanich No Accept the principle...453 Mr. Wan Yubamrung accepts the principle ....it will be over soon. Please listen to the voice.......
624 Accept the Principle 625 Accept the Principle 627 Accept the Principle 628 Accept the Principle 629 Accept the Principle 620 Not Accept the Principle ............642 Not accepting principles 645 Not accepting principles 646 Mr. Suriya Jungrungruangkit Not accepting the principle 651 Gen. Suwat Chaengyodsuk ....no voice came out....why? 653 Pol Maj. Gen. Sereepisuth Temeiwej accepts the principle 657 Mr. Ongart Kramphaiboon does not accept the principle 661 Adul Sangsrikao does not accept the principle .......
Tuan 85 Jiraporn Sinthuprai accepts the principle 222 Miss Teerarat Samremvanich does not accept the principle .....Siripong Angkasakulkiat Do not accept the principle ......
12.00 Closing of votes, preparing to count the results of the vote
Does not accept principles 473
Accept the principle ......... 206
More than half of the total voices? More than half means 362 votes.
received only 206 principles in total.
Conclusion not passed
@Su-ngai Padichinakun Kikmek Suwanmakin Buaraya Chababunset 17 Nov 2021 11.10
.jpg)
.jpg)
(1).jpg)
.jpg)
(1).jpg)
.jpg)
(1).jpg)
(1).jpg)
.jpg)
(1).jpg)
.jpg)
