Yesterday, March 17, 2021, there was a Thai parliament meeting since 9:30 am, both OSMEPs together when raising hands there was a total of 732 people, this number of thousands of people gathered in a large room. And then discuss the amendment of the Constitution of 2017 until today, come on Agenda 3 and will vote on whether to take or not, but before voting on this issue, they argue with each other all day. The Constitutional Court ordered down that if the Constitutional 60 is to be amended Ask the people who own the power first People to correct and thus solve If he doesn't have to fix it, he doesn't have to fix it,
That is the answer of the Constitutional Court. Which is enough to see that he adheres to the principles of democracy and the origin of the constitution of the 60th constitution is the constitution that has adopted a resolution of 16 million people in the entire country. This constitution causes the election of 24 March 2019 and the current government ruled the country. And including the 732 Senate Senate members arguing today,
Therefore, to amend this constitution, the owner of the constitution must first ask the owner of the constitution. Which is considered to adhere to the principle of democracy ..... but the parliament does not understand that. Thai politicians in spite of us in important positions. As the leader of the country That need to be merged with other countries in the world Still do not understand the constitution Don't understand politics Do not understand politics, democracy and others such as Lao politics, Khmer politics, Chinese politics, Russia, Japan, America too.
If I understood, I would not have to argue with each other in a daredevil all along. Any meeting of a House or Parliament is like a group of animals of different species, different knowledge and vision together. It's good to respect the rules and keep talking Don't take any other way The type that had been before, the chair was thrown by the chairperson of the House of Commons. There was no hijacking and attacking each other, which should have been the same in order to prove the principle of Majori and Minority to clearly understand that. In this democracy, he must agree on Majority rule Minority right. Any side who raises their hand more wins. Which the UDD must respect this principle without preconditions There is no accusation that those who win it, the bad people, the bad ones. That it defeats all the robbers Absolutely not ....
But today the council has When agreeing to raise the hand to find the winning side (will it pass the 3rd term or not?), It is said that he is Tada Thaiset, the Bhumjaithai Uthai Thani Party, angrily rising up with steppe. To vote for agenda 3 is a violation of people's rights, the Joke Council, Srithananchai, and I do not ask to vote. Then the Bhumjaithai Party walked out of the parliament. ... is this, I don't understand democracy. Did not see the importance of the political rule ... which if the political rules are not accepted How does politics have a plan? So it has been chaotic for 89 years, so we want the people of power to look carefully and do not bring people like this into the parliament.
Which constitutes a constitution Amendment (No. ....) B.E. ..... did not pass There will be no amendments to the constitution, Constitution 60 will continue, and if the parliament thinks about it to amend the constitution Must listen to the Constitutional Court's order Ordered down by the request of the parliament itself That if the constitution is to be modified Ask the people of the constitution first to ask whether to edit or make a new version or not? ..... People already don't know about the constitution. How to amend the constitution? Congress meeting today Therefore tells about this national group of persons Still don't understand that What is the constitution? What is politics, I still do not know.
And who always claimed that he supported democracy Have to dismiss the dictator or at Sor Nuttawut Prasertsuwan Chart Thai Pattana Party Rose to debate scolding that the Constitutional Court Dissolution of political parties The prime minister has been fired, three people have power over the lawmakers. Above management Then there are people who continue to say There is a mutant dictator ruling Thailand today. That must be solved People are very desperate at this time. ..... and who still don't understand it again is the kid's party There are many steps. That today is even more telling about the lack of understanding of politics at all And what is misunderstood by the opposition party for Thailand, is to understand that the constitution is a complete democracy and the country will progress. The people's economy will flourish. It really depends on resolving the constitution to be democracy .... which is not at all. People who understand like this Who are doing something very irrational today .........
When all the mistakes go like this It's all the wrong way, why don't you look at political research, the constitution may not make anyone wealthy. It is possible to thrive in the economy and society. Look at China, what politics is he? Communism, right? So why can he get rich at the world power without regard to the democratic constitution at all? Where can I claim that as long as the constitution is not democratic until then, where is Thailand forever poor? Look at the reason And look at America Today, more than 300,000 deaths from COVID 19 have died. The economy is depressed throughout the country. The dead, the economy dies. First in the world, despite being a great power, democracy has a perfect constitution, democracy, not yet able to fight Thailand. Thailand who used constitutional thieves that the opposition party always scolded. In Thailand, we defeat COVID. Thai people survived It's only 83 bodies, compared to hundreds of thousands of people in the world democracy, how are you going to claim that it is a constitutional, we are not a democracy?
It is therefore not related to the constitution. What is it about This is about Executive power And refers to the government and this administrative government Refers to any regime politics Get a good management team That is why it can lead to wealth. Not going to resolve the constitution to be a democracy so you can get rich Not like that But now, the Party for the Future Forward, Pheu Thai, is really wrong to the point that when the constitution is completely democratically modified, the people's country will prosper and have a good economy. Immediately became rich. The constitutional amendment is something that the new generation Let's fight without forsaken with patriotism - people. If it is the NCPO dictator or This kind of mutation has no way that the economy will prosper and prosper ... which is even more evident. When Mr. Rangsiman Rome, the list (not the MPs that people vote for one-on-one like other MPs, he Being a level 2 MP) the old future party Become a forward-thinking party, fully insisting that the 60th constitution is damaging to the Thai economy. Thailand is poor today because of the thief constitution. There are problems in all areas, especially the constitution that destroys human rights. His party therefore understands the youth who are fighting for democracy. Always fought to amend the constitution Go together with the modern youth Only those who understand the constitution must be able to democratize to become rich .....
Then there was a longstanding MP who planned propaganda to work in the middle of the prestigious parliament. Bringing together the label raised, folded with the message that To set them free in prison. Correct human rights ... Prepare banners to fill his party, so how can it be done? Like a thug in the middle of the royal road This is the national parliament. Size to do on the road In the middle of the garbage mob, you shouldn't do it at all. Good people in Parliament must be seen. There was another protest against Ulut. This is a very open show that the Kao Farai Party and Mr. Rangsiman This Romans was the same as those out-of-council junk mobs. It has always been a coordinator in and outside the Parliament. But today it is clear evidence that can be taken into legal proceedings. And patriotic people Love democracy should consider
And this tells me of this guy's political incomprehensibility. That the people will deem it more dangerous to democracy and not suitable for any position in the parliament, and how to fix it? This guy even more did not know about it. I know only to fix the revolution of the monarchy, which has always been fought by itself. And cited as a matter that can be said normally as a matter of freedom that democracy can criticize like the general public (which indicates disrespect in the history of Thailand or not knowing the history of Thailand at all), but the council does not apply. Then to create a behavior to defuse their stupidity that is no longer suitable for being in Parliament Even if only a democratic system This is not suitable anyway,
And today's parliamentary meeting ended with open ballot, and the outcome of the vote. Only 208 votes to approve, must be more than half, ie more than 369 votes to win, lose, and lose. Which had been considered from the beginning of the divorce that were shaken to each other throughout the land Ended with no more rubbish mob to resist (There is an electric power in the Parliament to shock the signal, the fire wakes up for a while ... probably understand more political things) If you are going to amend it, you will do it according to the order of the Constitutional Court. People have to ask the public first if they want to fix it or not .....
Which today we should understand that The problem that we encountered for a long time and today is the problem of the constitution itself. With all the flaws, it is a matter ........ This is because the OSMEP. We do not understand politics. Don't understand democracy Therefore went to other people to draft a constitution for Now, even though the politicians in the parliament do not understand politics, do not understand how to draft a constitution to amend the constitution to become a complete democracy. So how are people going to understand it? ...... Take just the point that This draft makes Thai politics a democracy. Which section to draft in which section is still unknown at all, and the size that he drafted to constitutional 60 It is democratic enough, it is full of some important matters already. I do not know more about the goodness of the Constitution. 60, at least I have to know that if the correction Which section to amend the section in the old constitution, because the original thing is already good We must keep it. It has a cultural fit and why do you stop losing it, such as the discussion of not trusting rathal here that directly tells the power of the MPs, the people of the people directly, has been done twice. And that's fine, there must be in every constitution that is democratic, must continue to be culturally, elected every four years. Which tells about the sharing of power of democracy at the 4th anniversary of the election This is also universal There is already in the constitution. 60 is maintained, anything that is not enough is added to The original constitution is called continually. Planting trees Yes, if it is planted into the soil, it will grow very fruitful. When will it be effective and then we are going to plow and plant again. It was a good fool. I don't know what good things already exist, I don't even know. How do you go about making a complete amendment to the constitution? How can a person like this come to the parliament? Then fired all Not fired, he waited for the democracy tree to be uprooted. Without knowing the reasons for democracy How will democracy grow? @ Su-Ngai Padi Chinakulkhikmek Na Makin Buaraya Chaba Boonset 18 Mar 2021 10.00
